Publication Content

PASSIG David Israel in 2048
David Passig
Yediot Aharonot Books, Chemed Books 2010
Reviewed by M. Eliany
David Passig, a professor at Bar Ilan University, defines himself as a futurist, who relies on geographic characteristic of our world to analyze, and, to the extent possible, assess national destinies. His book, 2048, consists of 5 parts.

In the first two parts, Passig lays the historical and geographical tenets of his analysis, while relying on a variety of sources, and especially, George Friedman抯 America抯 Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle between the United States and its Enemies (2005, Anchor Press). Passig then relies on his methodology to assess relations between super-powers and potential conflicts, in the third part of his book. But all the first three parts are but a mean to address his main goals, i.e., the geopolitics of the Middles East (fourth part) and Israel (fifth and concluding part).
The first three parts are of interests to researchers and students who seek in-depth understanding on analytical methods. The last two parts are of interest to common people who want to understand what is likely to determine the fate of the Middle East and Israel.

Briefly speaking, Passig conveys in his analysis that Israel is subject to geopolitical forces that determine its fate. Then he recommends being attentive to these geopolitical forces to improve Israel抯 survival. He points out that Israel came into being as a state on three historical occasions (David抯 Kingdom, the kingdom of the Maccabaeus and Contemporary Israel), subject to specific conditions, i.e.,
1. Israel抯 ability to maintain unity within its ranks;
2. Israel抯 ability to develop working relations with leading benevolent regional (ancient Persia) or international (British, Russian or American) super 杙owers.

However, Israel抯 survival as an independent entity is threatened, as soon as, inner unity declines (i.e., the split of Salomon抯 kingdom into Israel and Judea) or when a ruthless super-power rises and has no vested interest in Israel抯 existence or support (i.e., Babylon).

Passig does not consider contemporary Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq or Jordan pose any significant threat to Israel, due to desert barriers and conflicting interests between the different parties. And finally, he does not consider Syria, or Palestinians, as major threats to Israel, due to geopolitical limitations. Israel may have to launch war against Syria and Lebanon and occupy some of their territories and hold on to them until geopolitical condition elevate Turkey into a position of regional power, in conflict with USA.
Passig does consider Turkey as a major threat, if it rises as an independent regional power, which breaks away from American influence and dismisses the need for Israel抯 support. Therefore, he urges Israelis to adopt a measure of modesty and find ways to maintain beneficial relations with Turkey, which shall assist Israel in achieving peace with it neighbors.
Passig抯 proposes Israelis to add geographical methods to their analytical arsenal to gain an improved understanding of what is yet to come.

3 thoughts on “Publication Content

  1. 砖诇讜诐 专讘,

    诪拽讜讜讛 砖讛讙注转讬 诇诪拽讜诐 讛谞讻讜谉 诇砖讗讜诇 讗转 砖讗诇转讬, 诇讛讘讬注 讗转 讛转注谞讬谞讜转讬

    拽专讗转讬 讻诪讛 讜讻诪讛 诪讗诪专讬诐 砖诇讱, 讗讜讜讛 砖注讜专专讜 讘讬 注谞讬讬谉, 讛谞讜砖讗 砖诇 转专讘讜转 讛拽驻讬讟诇讬讝诐, 讗讜 诪讛 讗讞专讬 讛拽驻讬讟诇讬讝诐 诪注谞讬讬谉 讗讜转讬 诪讗讚.

    讗谞讬 讘讜讙专转 转讜讗专 砖谞讬 讘讗谞转专讜驻讜诇讜讙讬讛 讜注讜讘讚转 砖谞讬诐 专讘讜转 讘讗专讙讜谉 讙讚讜诇 诪讗讚, 讘转驻拽讬讚 砖诇 注讬爪讜讘 讛讞讝讜谉 讜讛转专讘讜转 讛讗专讙讜谞讬转.

    诪注谞讬讬谉 诇讬 诇讚注转 讗诐 讬砖谞诐 拽讜专住讬诐 砖讗转 谞讜转谞转 讘谞讜砖讗讬诐 讗诇讛 讘诪专讻讝 讛讘讬谞转讞讜诪讬 讘讛专爪诇讬讛.

    转讜讚讛 专讘讛 – 诪讬讻诇 讗专讝讬

  2. 诪拽住讬诐 砖诇讜诐
    讗谞讬 爪讬讬专 .讟住 讘注讜讚 讞讜讚砖 诇拽谞讚讛 讛讘谉 砖诇讬 讞讬 砖诐 讞讬驻砖转讬 讙诇专讬讜转 讘拽谞讚讛 砖讗讜讻诇 诇注谞讬讬谉 讗讜转诐
    讜讛讙注转讬 诇讗转专 砖诇讱 讗谞讬 砖讜诇讞 诇讱 讗转 讛拽讬砖讜专 诇讗转专 砖诇讬 .讗讜讚讛 诇讱 诇讱 讗诐 转讘讬讟 讘讜
    讘讘专讻讛 诪讜讟讬 讻讛谉

    讗砖诪讞 诇砖诪讜注 讗转 转讙讜讘转讱.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *